Accessibility services

Find the barriers. Fix the journeys. Prove what changed.

Audita QA combines automated discovery, manual accessibility testing and critical-journey evidence across desktop and mobile. Material findings are reviewed before they reach your team.

How accessibility evidence becomes action
Automated discoveryRepeatable rule checks
Manual interactionKeyboard, focus, forms and states
Critical journeysTasks, errors and recovery
Human reviewContext, impact and evidence checked
Prioritised findings
Fix guidance
Retest evidence
Desktop and mobile by defaultAgreed browser and assistive-technology baseline

What we do

Choose the accessibility work your team needs.

Start with the buyer problem, then agree the pages, components, journeys, environments and evidence needed to answer it.

Audit and conformance review

You need a defensible baseline before launch, procurement or remediation planning.

We combine automated discovery, documented manual procedures and critical-journey testing against an agreed WCAG 2.2 scope.

What you receive
  • Prioritised findings
  • Accessible report and evidence register
Scope an audit

Manual interaction testing

You need to know whether people can operate the interface beyond automated rules.

We test keyboard access, focus behaviour, zoom and reflow, forms, errors and status changes in the agreed browsers and assistive-technology baseline.

What you receive
  • Reproducible interaction evidence
  • User-impact and standards mapping
Discuss manual testing

Critical-journey testing

You need confidence that essential tasks work from entry to completion.

We exercise agreed user journeys, including validation, error and recovery states, across desktop and mobile unless the scope states otherwise.

What you receive
  • Journey-level evidence
  • Barriers linked to task completion
Plan journey coverage

Design and component review

You want to prevent repeat defects before patterns reach production.

We review agreed designs and reusable components for accessibility risks, interaction requirements and testable acceptance criteria.

What you receive
  • Annotated design risks
  • Component acceptance criteria
Review a design system

Remediation support and verification

Your team has findings but needs clear fix direction and evidence that changes worked.

We clarify findings, review proposed fixes and retest the original conditions so resolved, remaining and regressed issues stay visible.

What you receive
  • Implementation-ready guidance
  • Retest status and closure evidence
Plan remediation support

Continuous accessibility assurance

You need accessibility evidence to keep pace with releases and design changes.

We maintain agreed journey and regression coverage, review material findings and show what is new, recurring or resolved over time.

What you receive
  • Comparable release history
  • Recurring-risk and regression view
Set an assurance cadence

Ways to engage

Begin with a defined outcome.

Choose a focused audit, support through remediation, or a recurring assurance cadence. Scope and deliverables are agreed before work begins.

Accessibility audit and journey review

Find the barriers affecting a defined service, product or release, then give your team reviewed evidence it can act on.

Best for
Launch readiness, procurement evidence and prioritising an existing service.
Core output
Prioritised findings with impact and reproduction steps
Scope an accessibility audit Service details

Remediation support and verification

Turn reviewed findings into clear fix decisions, then verify changes against the original evidence.

Best for
Teams working through a reviewed audit backlog and preparing fixes for release.
Core output
Updated finding status and retest notes
Plan remediation support Service details

Continuous accessibility assurance

Build scheduled testing, journey coverage and human review into an active delivery cycle.

Best for
Product teams maintaining critical services across releases and design changes.
Core output
Comparable run history
Set an assurance cadence Service details
Compare engagement coverage

Evidence you can use

Clear enough for delivery. Structured enough for governance.

An ergonomic keyboard and mouse on a designer's technical desk.
Keyboard review is recorded alongside automated, manual and journey evidence.
  • Each finding records the affected journey, viewport and test environment.
  • User impact, reproduction steps and remediation direction stay together.
  • Uncertainty, exclusions and unavailable states are visible rather than hidden.
  • Retests preserve the original conditions and the result of the verification.

Plan the right assessment

Tell us what must work, who depends on it and what decision the evidence needs to support.